A person is justified in using force in self-defense when they believe it is necessary for what purpose?

A person is justified in using force in self-defense when they believe it is necessary to protect themselves against unlawful force. Self-defense laws are designed to allow individuals to defend themselves when faced with an imminent threat of harm. The key aspect of this justification is the perception of an imminent danger of unlawful force; the use of force must be proportional and necessary to prevent harm.

In this context, protecting oneself against unlawful force encompasses situations where an individual is under threat, such as an attack or potential violence from another person. This principle acknowledges the right to ensure personal safety when confronted with such threats.

The other options do not align with the core principles of self-defense. Resolving a verbal argument does not typically justify the use of physical force, as it is necessary to de-escalate conflict rather than escalate it. Intimidating another person is an abuse of power and not a defensible action under self-defense laws. Preventing theft may justify some defensive actions, but it does not encompass self-defense unless the individual is simultaneously threatened with harm. Thus, the most accurate reason for justifying force in self-defense is to protect oneself from unlawful force.