Under what circumstance may a peace officer NOT use deadly force?

A peace officer may not use deadly force to prevent someone from fleeing after committing arson because the use of deadly force is typically justified only when there is an immediate threat to life or a threat of serious bodily harm. In the scenario described, while arson is a serious crime, it does not inherently involve a danger to life at the moment of the suspect's fleeing. The situation must present an imminent threat to life to justify such extreme measures. Law enforcement guidelines generally emphasize de-escalation and the necessity of force, making the use of deadly force inappropriate in circumstances where the threat does not warrant it, such as a fleeing suspect who does not pose an immediate danger to officers or the public.