Which scenario does NOT support the justification of using deadly force?

The scenario that does not support the justification of using deadly force is when it involves stopping someone from stealing. Generally, the use of deadly force is considered justified in situations where there is an imminent threat to life or serious bodily harm, such as in cases of sexual assault, when responding to a lethal threat, or when protecting an innocent life. Theft, on the other hand, does not typically pose an immediate threat to someone’s safety or life. Law enforcement and legal standards usually advocate for non-lethal responses or intervention methods that do not involve deadly force in the context of property crimes. Thus, addressing the situation of theft with deadly force is not justified under most circumstances.